·
Arms
Control and Disarmament
Why there is less Success in Arms Control and Disarmament
Efforts?
OR
What are Problems/Hurdles in Arms Control and Disarmament?
·
Super Powers’ Dilemma: Unfortunately it is dilemma of world politics that those countries
who are the initiator of arms control effort are largest weapons producer and exporter
of weapons. Secondly these nations are in immense competition against each other
in this field. Thirdly these super powers are engaged in multiple military
operation in the world which enhanced the feelings of insecurity and might is
right. These super powers have certain global ambitions which enable them to
possess dangerous weapons which defiantly sometimes used against weaker nations
for any national or global interest.
·
Weapons Trade a Profitable Business: Weapon trade
has become a largest profit oriented industry in the world. Previously only
states involved in weapon trade but with the emergence of global Multinational
Corporation, this business develops a lot in all over the world. Because these
companies have profit motives so they find out more market or create more
market.
·
Depletion of Natural Resources: Due globalization
of international businesses and finance the chances of competition among
nations increased a lot and with the passage of time this competition convert
into conflict because of depletion of natural resources and increasing
competition for existing meager natural resources lead toward clash of national
interest among nations. So for their security in business at international
level states are engaging in armaments.
·
Human Nature: It is
human nature that man always feel sense of insecurity from other nations and
always tried to depend on its own power. Man always has sense of superiority over
others and these feelings enable him to develop more weapons.
·
Unresolved Conflicts among States: Unresolved
conflicts among nations since history or current are another cause of failure
of arms control and disarmament efforts in the world. Like issue of Kashmir end
other border dispute between India and Pakistan develop a sense of insecurity
against each other and this sense enables them to develop nuclear weapons and
other weapons of mass destruction. Similarly
issue of Palestine and Israel which led a long lasting conflict among Arab
nations and Israel which led three wars between these two communities. Same situation
in various other nations of Africa and Asia.
·
Failure of Liberalism (to some extent): Lack of implementation of decision of international organizations
like UNO, IEAE, and NPT. Unfortunately these organizations unable to fulfill
their fundamental objective completely. Their purpose was excellent but if a
nation violates their decisions then they took not such an exemplary action
against these violations of international law. But other nations claim that if
they did not make their own weapons then what is the guarantee of their
security from the imperial ambitions and from the attack of their enemy states.
such kind of insecurity do not allow them to disarmament
·
Research in Science and Technology: manufacturing
new technological weapons and increasing research in this technology also a big
hurdle in reduction of arms control. Because nations spent billions of dollars
in this field and lot of share of GDP of this industry and number of employment
engage in this industry does not allow nations to stop this industry.
·
Marketing and Advertising of Show of Power: It is the
biggest hurdle in disarmament when the biggest budget of a film spent on such
films in which highest technological weapons are used and such movies are
appreciated, encouraged and got maximum businesses. This show of power
encourages other nations too. Even the game industry who spent billions of
dollars on such game manufacturing in which violence and torture is displaying and
kids who inspired of such games will not be fruitful citizens of the earth.
·
Growing threat of Terrorism: This
is unbearable truth of human history that after the incident of 9/11 the
nations feel more insecure internally and externally due to terrorist
organizations and their spreading networks. So this sense of protection of
their people every nation trying to develop more and more weapons and security
measure which led them to more and more armaments.
How Arms Control And Disarmament Efforts Get Success?
·
There
must be effective and result oriented role of arms control and disarmament agencies
·
Punishing
behavior of UNO in case of violation of international law which must be applicable
for every nation without any distinction of state’s status quo and make UNO
such a powerful international organization that small nations get confidence on
it and don’t make weapons
·
Stop
the marketing and publication of weapons through any source of media
·
Crush
the terrorism thinking instead of terrorist only because if this philosophy got
roots then to kill the terrorist only is not the solution. So people are encouraged
to combat this threat unanimously
·
Stop
the weapon industry as most profitable industry by banning the bulk production
of weapons and its spreading through multinational corporations.
·
Sincere
and honest effort of disarmament and arms control is required. Super powers
must forget their rivalries for humanity so that weaker nations feel
comfortable and confidence to live in the beautiful world.
·
Discourage
the investment in science and technology of weapons so that such amount of
money must spent on some humanitarian development.
·
Super
powers and international organizations must resolve the unresolved issues of
the world so that nations do not went against each other.
Definition:
The term “disarmament” refers to measures,
usually formal agreements, to reduce or completely abolish military capacities
and means (both weapons and troops).In contrast, “arms control” comprises
agreements aimed at reducing the danger of war breaking out and minimizing the
negative impacts of a war on human beings. This is why the concept of “arms
control” also includes instruments to promote transparency and build
confidence, for instance by means of reciprocal monitoring and inspection and
the setting of ceilings for weapons. The application of international
humanitarian law to protect people and the environment in war situations also
falls under the concept of arms control. (http://warpp.info/en/m7/articles/m7-01)
Early Efforts Of Arm Control And Disarmament
·
Treaty
of Westphalia (1648)
·
Demolish
the existing fortification and stop the new ones.
·
Czar of Russia's proposal in 1861 of reduction of
all type of armed forces.
·
Later
on 1863 and 1869 France proposed disarmament, then Britain 1870 and Italy1877 move
forward for disarmament.
·
Tsar of Russia in 1898
gave a systematic proposal which addressing to super powers of that time at
Hague. He even design a scheme of disarmament. This proposal was welcomed by
all powers which resulted into first Hague Peace Conference attended
by 28 states. A committee was designed for arms control. This committee
concluded its finding that time was not suitable for any kind of arms control
agreement. Later in 1907 second Hague Conference was called upon but unable to
produce any fruitful result. Thus all the efforts for arms control and
disarmament was failed.
After WWII
·
President
Wilson's point of view and Treaty of
Versailles. Both focus on disarmament by saying, "the maintenance
requires the reduction of national armaments to the lowest point consistent
with national safety and enforcement by common action of international
obligation". For this purpose League of Nations was created to reach an
agreement and in covenant it was decided that League's membership granted to
those states who agreed to disarmament and arms control. A Permanent
Advisory Committee was set up to formulate a program for arms reduction.
But this committee failed due to armaments of super powers of League.
·
Second attempt of League was the establishment of Temporary
Missed Commission which includes majority civilians. This commission
proposed:
•Fixation of land forces.
•Limited the naval armaments of great powers.
•International and to the victims of aggression and compulsory
arbitration.
But these
efforts were failed too
·
Establishment of Preparatory Commission by League in 1925
regarding provisional draft treaty about disarmament. This draft was presented
in Geneva Conference in 1932. The discussion continued for two years by
sixty one states. Efforts were jeopardized due to global situation like:
•Attack on Manchuria by Japan
•Emergence of Adolf Hitler and his armaments efforts and in 1933
Germany formally withdraw from Disarmament Conference
·
Washington Conference
1921-22 in which big five (US, France,
Britain, Japan, Italy) agreed to limits
their naval strength regarding cruiser, submarines, destroyer and aircrafts. But treaty was not
ratified. In 1930 these powers met again but failed to finalize any treaty. In
1935-36 another naval conference called upon but it also faced same
consequences.
UNO Efforts
·
UN
article 11 (I) regarding general principles governing disarmament and
regulation of armaments.
·
UN
article 26 regarding international peace and security in which Security Council
directed to formulate system for disarmament.
·
UN
article 47 (I) regarding the formulation of Military Staff Committee for the
assistance of Sc for disarmament.
After the
adoption of UN charter attack on Hiroshima and Nagasaki enhanced the importance
of formation governing body of nuclear assets i.e. IAEA in 26-1-1946 which
include 5 Security Council members plus Canada.
Other Bilateral, Multilateral Affords for Disarmament
and Arms Control
·
Baruch
plan June1946
·
Proposal
of Soviet Union June 1946
·
Establishment
of Commission on Conventional Armaments by Security Council in February 1947
but due to differences in Soviet and western, General Assembly adopted the
resolution urging the commission for Conventional Armament. But Soviet withdraws
from both these commissions on the basis of Red China representation in 1950.
·
Creation
of Disarmament Commissions 1952 on the suggestions of US president
Truman by the GA of UN. In 1958 all UN members are its members. But again
divergent views of super powers enable GA to establish a Great Power Sub
Committee.
·
Eisenhower's
"Atoms for Peace" Plan
(1953), regarding peaceful use of nuclear energy for international security
·
Three
phases of Disarmament in Anglo-French Plan (1954).
·
Soviet
proposal of disarmament in 1955 was totally disagreed by US because it insisted
on dismantling of all US overseas basis and ban on nuclear tests.
·
Open
Skies plan of US in Geneva Summit 1955.
·
US
representation by Six Point Plan for Disarmament in 1957 are endorsed by
UNGA.
·
Geneva
Conference 1959 by USA, USSR, UK regarding a
unilateral ban on test of atom and hydrogen bomb in earth's atmosphere, outer
space and in ocean and underground. But the explosion of Megaton Bomb by
USSR violation of this conference proposal.
·
A
successful Antarctic Treaty of 1959 regarding nuclear weapon free zone
of Antarctica. This treaty was signed successfully and put into practice by
USSA, USSR and 16 other states.
·
Disarmament
Conference of 1960 of 10 states in which
communist bloc (five) and other five from western bloc. In this conference USSR
proposed four year plan for disarmament in 3 phases. But this conference
resulted into dismal.
·
Disarmament
Conference by 18 states in 1962 and US
proposal for establishment of International commission of Scientists. But
conference again could not give fruitful results because of different plans of
Soviet and US.
·
Moscow
Treaty of 1963 regarding Limited Test Ban.
·
US
president Johnson's Seven Point Plan in 1960.
·
Outer
Space Treaty of 1967.
·
Conference
on non nuclear weapon states 1968.
·
Formation
of Nuclear Proliferation Treaty 1968 by 62 states.
·
UN Decade
of Disarmament (1970s).
·
Sea
bed Treaty of 1971.
·
"The
Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of
Bacteriological (biological) and Toxin weapon and on their destruction".
Date...
·
Strategic
Arms Limitation Treaty 1972.
·
May
26, 1972 two separatist treaties were signed between USSR and USA.
1- Treaty on the limitation of Antiballistic Missile System ABMS.
2- Interim agreement on certain measures IACM with regard to
strategic offensive Arms.
·
Accord
on Limitations of Arms between US and
USSR.
·
Threshold
Test Ban Treaty July 3, 1973
between US and USSR (TBTB)
·
Arms
Pact 1974 between US and USSR a ten year
pact.
·
Peaceful
Nuclear Explosion Treaty (PNET)
May 28, 1974 between US and USSR.
·
Final
Act of the Conference of the Security and Cooperation in Europe. July-August 1975, between UK, USA, USSR and number of
the European states.
·
Convention
on prohibition of Military or other Hostile use of Environmental Modification
Techniques 1977.
·
1980s
as Second Decade of Disarmament by UNO.
·
SALT
II (1979), SALT I lapsed in 1977.
·
1981
President Reagan’s four point agenda regarding disarmament.
·
INF
(intermediate range of nuclear force) held
in Geneva in 30-11-1981.
·
Brezhnev
Announcement of March 16,
1982.
·
START
negotiation 1982 in which (2) stage proposal of USA and (3) stage
proposal of USSR.
·
Talks b/w NATO and WARSAW PACT nations regarding mutual and Balanced
force Reduction in central Europe from March 18-1984 to July 19,1984.
·
Hotline
and DSL formation b/w USA and USSR.
·
Four
Continent Peace Initiatives May 22, 1984.
·
Geneva
Talks 1985.
·
INF
Treaty 1987.
·
Washington
Summit 1987 and Moscow Summit 1988.
·
Six
nations Summit at January 28,
1985 and another plan of six nations.
·
Special
sessions of UNGA on disarmament
·
Geneva
Talks on strategic Arms Reduction June
1989.
·
Super
power Summit 1990.
·
START-I 1991 July 3,
·
Alma
Ata Accord 1991.
Efforts of Arms Control and Disarmament after Cold
war
·
1992
protocol.
·
Summit
of 1992.
·
Extension
of NPT
·
After the cold and
disintegration of USS, The newly independent states like Ukraine, Belarus, and
Kazakhstan inherited few nuclear arsenal of former Soviet Union but these
nations quickly pursued complete nuclear disarmament they become nuclear free
states till 1996.
·
In 1992 (START II)
was reached between the United States and Russia that resulted into further
drastically reduce each country’s strategic nuclear forces over a period
extending into the early 21st century.
·
In
the 1990s both the super powers negotiated successfully on Chemical Weapons Convention (1993),
which prohibited the development, production, stockpiling, and use of chemical
weapons. They agreed for the destruction of existing stocks within 10 years.
·
The
1996 Comprehensive
Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty, which would prohibit all forms of nuclear
explosive testing, had been signed by more than 165 states and ratified by more
than 100 by the early 21st century but had failed to enter into force because
some of the 44 states whose signatures were required for its enactment
(including the United States, China,
India, Israel, North Korea,
and Pakistan) chose not to sign. (https://www.britannica.com/topic/arms-control/Recent-efforts)
·
In
1997, as a result of efforts led by the International Campaign to Ban Landmines (ICBL), a treaty
prohibiting the use of antipersonnel mines was negotiated; it went into effect
in 1999, and, by the early 21st century, nearly 150 countries had signed it,
though China, Russia, and the United States had not. (https://www.britannica.com/topic/arms-control/Recent-efforts)
·
In
June 2002, despite intense international opposition, the United States, citing
fundamental changes in its security needs since the 1970s, withdrew from the ABM
Treaty to pursue a national missile
defense system designed to protect the country against nuclear attack. The
United States subsequently offered to share defense technology with Russia and
cover some of its allies, but the Russian response was lukewarm. Although
Russia opposed the U.S. decision, its reaction was restrained; in May 2002,
five months after the United States announced its intent to withdraw from the
ABM Treaty, the two countries signed the Strategic Offensive Reductions Treaty,
which committed each side to reducing its store of strategic nuclear warheads.
Russia subsequently announced that it would no longer be bound by the START II
agreement, which its parliament had ratified in 2000. (https://www.britannica.com/topic/arms-control/Recent-efforts)
·
In
May 2008, representatives of more than 100 countries met in Dublin to conclude
an agreement that banned the use of cluster bombs, which release dozens of smaller bombs (“bomb
lets”) over a wide area. The Cluster Munitions Coalition, a network of nongovernmental organizations
including the ICBL and Amnesty
International, had spearheaded efforts to prohibit the devices on the
grounds that unexploded bomb lets present a lethal risk to civilians long after
a conflict has ended. The Convention on Cluster Munitions was adopted despite
opposition from the largest manufacturers and stockpiles of the weapons
(including China, Russia, and the United States). It was signed in December
2008 and entered into force on Aug. 1, 2010. (https://www.britannica.com/topic/arms-control/Recent-efforts)
No comments:
Post a Comment